2000 Saturn LW vs. 1996 Saturn SL

To start off, 2000 Saturn LW is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Saturn SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Saturn SL would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Saturn LW is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Saturn LW (136 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1996 Saturn SL. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Saturn LW should accelerate faster than 1996 Saturn SL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Saturn LW weights approximately 342 kg more than 1996 Saturn SL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Saturn LW (193 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Saturn SL. (158 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Saturn LW will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Saturn SL. 2000 Saturn LW has automatic transmission and 1996 Saturn SL has manual transmission. 1996 Saturn SL will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Saturn LW will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: