2000 Saturn SC vs. 2005 Scion xA
To start off, 2005 Scion xA is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Saturn SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Saturn SC would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Saturn SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Scion xA (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2000 Saturn SC. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Scion xA should accelerate faster than 2000 Saturn SC.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Saturn SC (154 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Scion xA. (142 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2000 Saturn SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Scion xA.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Saturn SC | 2005 Scion xA | |
Make | Saturn | Scion |
Model | SC | xA |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 154 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |