2000 Seat Alhambra vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Seat Alhambra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Seat Alhambra would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 55 kg more than 2000 Seat Alhambra.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Seat Alhambra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 2000 Seat Alhambra has manual transmission. 2000 Seat Alhambra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Seat Alhambra | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Seat | Ford |
Model | Alhambra | Ranger |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3010 mm |