2000 Seat Arosa vs. 1956 Simca Aronde
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 1,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Arosa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1956 Simca Aronde. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Because 1956 Simca Aronde is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Simca Aronde. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Seat Arosa (117 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Simca Aronde. (90 Nm). This means 2000 Seat Arosa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Simca Aronde.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Seat Arosa | 1956 Simca Aronde | |
| Make | Seat | Simca |
| Model | Arosa | Aronde |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1359 cc | 1290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 117 Nm | 90 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2450 mm |
