2000 Seat Arosa vs. 1956 Simca Vedette
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Simca Vedette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Simca Vedette would be higher. At 2,351 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Simca Vedette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1956 Simca Vedette. (79 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 1956 Simca Vedette. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Arosa weights approximately 109 kg more than 1956 Simca Vedette. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Simca Vedette is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Simca Vedette. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Seat Arosa | 1956 Simca Vedette | |
Make | Seat | Simca |
Model | Arosa | Vedette |
Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1359 cc | 2351 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1289 kg | 1180 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2700 mm |