2000 Seat Arosa vs. 1978 Toyota Corona

To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1978 Toyota Corona. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 1978 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Arosa weights approximately 317 kg more than 1978 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Toyota Corona (130 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Seat Arosa. (117 Nm). This means 1978 Toyota Corona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Seat Arosa.

Compare all specifications: