2000 Seat Arosa vs. 1982 Suzuki SJ 410
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Suzuki SJ 410 would be higher. At 1,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Arosa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. (44 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Arosa weights approximately 419 kg more than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Suzuki SJ 410 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Seat Arosa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Suzuki SJ 410 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Seat Arosa (117 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. (74 Nm). This means 2000 Seat Arosa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Seat Arosa | 1982 Suzuki SJ 410 | |
Make | Seat | Suzuki |
Model | Arosa | SJ 410 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1359 cc | 970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 74 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1289 kg | 870 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2040 mm |