2000 Seat Arosa vs. 1986 Seat Ronda
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 1,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Arosa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1986 Seat Ronda. (62 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 1986 Seat Ronda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Arosa weights approximately 389 kg more than 1986 Seat Ronda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Seat Arosa (117 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Seat Ronda. (88 Nm). This means 2000 Seat Arosa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Seat Arosa | 1986 Seat Ronda | |
| Make | Seat | Seat |
| Model | Arosa | Ronda |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1359 cc | 1193 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 117 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1289 kg | 900 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2460 mm |
