2000 Seat Arosa vs. 2013 GMC Acadia

To start off, 2013 GMC Acadia is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Seat Arosa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Seat Arosa would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 GMC Acadia (284 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 2000 Seat Arosa. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 GMC Acadia should accelerate faster than 2000 Seat Arosa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 GMC Acadia weights approximately 914 kg more than 2000 Seat Arosa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 GMC Acadia is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Seat Arosa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 GMC Acadia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 GMC Acadia (366 Nm) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Seat Arosa. (117 Nm). This means 2013 GMC Acadia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Seat Arosa. 2013 GMC Acadia has automatic transmission and 2000 Seat Arosa has manual transmission. 2000 Seat Arosa will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 GMC Acadia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: