2000 Seat Inca Kombi vs. 1965 ZAZ 966

To start off, 2000 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,391 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Inca Kombi (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1965 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Inca Kombi should accelerate faster than 1965 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 295 kg more than 1965 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Inca Kombi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Seat Inca Kombi (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Seat Inca Kombi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 ZAZ 966.

Compare all specifications: