2000 Seat Inca Kombi vs. 1985 Suzuki SJ 410

To start off, 2000 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Suzuki SJ 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Suzuki SJ 410 would be higher. At 1,391 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Inca Kombi (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1985 Suzuki SJ 410. (44 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Inca Kombi should accelerate faster than 1985 Suzuki SJ 410. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 165 kg more than 1985 Suzuki SJ 410. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1985 Suzuki SJ 410 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Seat Inca Kombi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Suzuki SJ 410 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Seat Inca Kombi (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Suzuki SJ 410. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Seat Inca Kombi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Suzuki SJ 410.

Compare all specifications: