2000 Seat Inca Kombi vs. 1986 Suzuki Samurai
To start off, 2000 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Suzuki Samurai. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Suzuki Samurai would be higher. At 1,391 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Suzuki Samurai (69 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2000 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Suzuki Samurai should accelerate faster than 2000 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 105 kg more than 1986 Suzuki Samurai.
Because 1986 Suzuki Samurai is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Seat Inca Kombi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Suzuki Samurai will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Seat Inca Kombi (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Suzuki Samurai. (103 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Seat Inca Kombi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Suzuki Samurai.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Seat Inca Kombi | 1986 Suzuki Samurai | |
Make | Seat | Suzuki |
Model | Inca Kombi | Samurai |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1391 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 69 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 107 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 930 kg |