2000 Skoda Fabia vs. 1981 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 2000 Skoda Fabia is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 90 kg more than 2000 Skoda Fabia.
Because 1981 Toyota Cressida is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Toyota Cressida. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Skoda Fabia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Skoda Fabia | 1981 Toyota Cressida | |
Make | Skoda | Toyota |
Model | Fabia | Cressida |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1422 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.6 mm | 89 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 70 L |