2000 Skoda Octavia vs. 2012 BMW M5
To start off, 2012 BMW M5 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Skoda Octavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Skoda Octavia would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 BMW M5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW M5 (560 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 459 more horse power than 2000 Skoda Octavia. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW M5 should accelerate faster than 2000 Skoda Octavia.
Because 2012 BMW M5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 BMW M5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW M5 (680 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 532 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Skoda Octavia. (148 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2012 BMW M5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Skoda Octavia.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Skoda Octavia | 2012 BMW M5 | |
Make | Skoda | BMW |
Model | Octavia | M5 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 4400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 560 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 680 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1455 mm |