2000 Skoda Superb vs. 2012 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Skoda Superb. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Skoda Superb would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Skoda Superb is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-Z (122 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2000 Skoda Superb. (113 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 2000 Skoda Superb. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Skoda Superb weights approximately 274 kg more than 2012 Honda CR-Z.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 173 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Skoda Superb | 2012 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Skoda | Honda |
Model | Superb | CR-Z |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1487 kg | 1213 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2436 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 40 L |