2000 Smart ForFour vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Smart ForFour. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Smart ForFour would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2000 Smart ForFour. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2000 Smart ForFour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1000 kg more than 2000 Smart ForFour. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Smart ForFour. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Smart ForFour | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Smart | Volvo |
Model | ForFour | XC90 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 72 L |