2000 Smart ForTwo vs. 2003 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2003 Pagani Zonda is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 468 more horse power than 2000 Smart ForTwo. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 2000 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Pagani Zonda weights approximately 430 kg more than 2000 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Smart ForTwo | 2003 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | Smart | Pagani |
Model | ForTwo | Zonda |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 698 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 542 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 335 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2730 mm |