2000 Smart ForTwo vs. 2009 Subaru Tribeca
To start off, 2009 Subaru Tribeca is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 3,630 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Subaru Tribeca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Subaru Tribeca (254 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 2000 Smart ForTwo. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Tribeca should accelerate faster than 2000 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Subaru Tribeca weights approximately 649 kg more than 2000 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Subaru Tribeca is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Smart ForTwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Tribeca will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Subaru Tribeca (350 Nm @ 450 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Smart ForTwo. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Subaru Tribeca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Smart ForTwo. 2009 Subaru Tribeca has automatic transmission and 2000 Smart ForTwo has manual transmission. 2000 Smart ForTwo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Subaru Tribeca will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Smart ForTwo | 2009 Subaru Tribeca | |
| Make | Smart | Subaru |
| Model | ForTwo | Tribeca |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 698 cc | 3630 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 254 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 450 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66.5 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 67 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 135 km/hour | 207 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 15.5 seconds | 8.9 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1464 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 64 L |
