2000 Smart ForTwo vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Smart ForTwo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 660 kg more than 2000 Smart ForTwo.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Smart ForTwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (281 Nm @ 5600 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Smart ForTwo. (110 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Smart ForTwo | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Smart | Mini |
| Model | ForTwo | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66.5 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 67 mm | 85 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4133 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2595 mm |
