2000 SsangYong Korando vs. 1966 TVR Griffith
To start off, 2000 SsangYong Korando is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 TVR Griffith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 TVR Griffith would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 TVR Griffith is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 TVR Griffith (229 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2000 SsangYong Korando. (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 TVR Griffith should accelerate faster than 2000 SsangYong Korando.
Because 2000 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 TVR Griffith. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 SsangYong Korando | 1966 TVR Griffith | |
Make | SsangYong | TVR |
Model | Korando | Griffith |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2874 cc | 4727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 229 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2170 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 67 L |