2000 SsangYong Rexton vs. 1982 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2000 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 SsangYong Rexton (118 HP) has 79 more horse power than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 1136 kg more than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 SsangYong Rexton (256 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (74 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2000 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 SsangYong Rexton | 1982 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | SsangYong | Volkswagen |
Model | Rexton | Polo |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2874 cc | 1043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 39 HP |
Torque | 256 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.4 mm | 59 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 22.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1851 kg | 715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2340 mm |