2000 SsangYong Rexton vs. 2011 Volvo C70
To start off, 2011 Volvo C70 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 SsangYong Rexton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 SsangYong Rexton would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 160 kg more than 2011 Volvo C70.
Because 2000 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Volvo C70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C70 (400 Nm @ 1250 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 SsangYong Rexton. (318 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2011 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 SsangYong Rexton.
Compare all specifications:
2000 SsangYong Rexton | 2011 Volvo C70 | |
Make | SsangYong | Volvo |
Model | Rexton | C70 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3197 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 318 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 1250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2639 mm |