2000 Suzuki Vitara vs. 1976 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Suzuki Vitara is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Suzuki Vitara is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Suzuki Vitara weights approximately 40 kg more than 1976 Toyota Celica.
Because 2000 Suzuki Vitara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Suzuki Vitara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Suzuki Vitara | 1976 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
| Model | Vitara | Celica |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2510 mm |
