2000 Suzuki Vitara vs. 1979 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Suzuki Vitara is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1979 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Toyota Celica (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2000 Suzuki Vitara. (79 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2000 Suzuki Vitara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Toyota Celica weights approximately 190 kg more than 2000 Suzuki Vitara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1979 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Suzuki Vitara. (126 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1979 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Suzuki Vitara.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Suzuki Vitara | 1979 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
Model | Vitara | Celica |
Year Released | 2000 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2640 mm |