2000 Suzuki Vitara vs. 1981 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Suzuki Vitara is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,905 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Suzuki Vitara is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Suzuki Vitara weights approximately 185 kg more than 1981 Mazda 626.
Because 2000 Suzuki Vitara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Suzuki Vitara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Mazda 626 has automatic transmission and 2000 Suzuki Vitara has manual transmission. 2000 Suzuki Vitara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Mazda 626 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Suzuki Vitara | 1981 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Mazda |
| Model | Vitara | 626 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1905 cc | 1584 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1045 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2520 mm |
