2000 Suzuki XL6 vs. 1983 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 2000 Suzuki XL6 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Suzuki XL6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Toyota Cressida (104 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2000 Suzuki XL6. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Toyota Cressida should accelerate faster than 2000 Suzuki XL6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Suzuki XL6 weights approximately 275 kg more than 1983 Toyota Cressida.
Because 2000 Suzuki XL6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Toyota Cressida. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Suzuki XL6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Suzuki XL6 (218 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Cressida. (162 Nm). This means 2000 Suzuki XL6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Cressida.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Suzuki XL6 | 1983 Toyota Cressida | |
| Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
| Model | XL6 | Cressida |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2650 mm |
