2000 Tata Estate vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Tata Estate. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Tata Estate would be higher. At 1,948 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Tata Estate is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot RCZ (156 HP) has 89 more horse power than 2000 Tata Estate. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 2000 Tata Estate.
Because 2000 Tata Estate is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Tata Estate. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Tata Estate | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
Make | Tata | Peugeot |
Model | Estate | RCZ |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1948 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 156 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4287 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1359 mm |