2000 Toyota Caserta vs. 1965 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 2000 Toyota Caserta is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,995 cc, 2000 Toyota Caserta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Caserta (71 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1965 Triumph Vitesse. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Caserta should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph Vitesse. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Caserta weights approximately 56 kg more than 1965 Triumph Vitesse. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Caserta (140 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph Vitesse. (126 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Caserta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph Vitesse.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Toyota Caserta | 1965 Triumph Vitesse | |
| Make | Toyota | Triumph |
| Model | Caserta | Vitesse |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1596 cc |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 126 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 880 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 29 L |
