2000 Toyota Caserta vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2000 Toyota Caserta is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda Midge (104 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (71 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Caserta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda Midge weights approximately 114 kg more than 2000 Toyota Caserta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Caserta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Toyota Caserta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda Midge (156 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (140 Nm). This means 1994 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Caserta.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Toyota Caserta | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Toyota | Mazda |
Model | Caserta | Midge |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 156 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 1050 kg |