2000 Toyota Caserta vs. 2008 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2008 Volvo XC70 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Caserta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Caserta would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volvo XC70 (235 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (71 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Caserta.
Because 2008 Volvo XC70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Toyota Caserta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo XC70 (320 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (140 Nm). This means 2008 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Caserta.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Toyota Caserta | 2008 Volvo XC70 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Caserta | XC70 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3192 cc |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 235 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 70 L |
