2000 Toyota Caserta vs. 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser
To start off, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Caserta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Caserta would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser (260 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (71 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Caserta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser weights approximately 914 kg more than 2000 Toyota Caserta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser (367 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (140 Nm). This means 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Caserta.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Toyota Caserta | 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser | |
| Make | Toyota | Toyota |
| Model | Caserta | FJ Cruiser |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 4000 cc |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 367 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 1850 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 72 L |
