2000 Toyota Celica vs. 1964 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 1,837 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Celica (190 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Crown. (80 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 290 kg more than 1964 Toyota Crown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (177 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Toyota Crown. (145 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Toyota Celica | 1964 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Toyota | Toyota |
| Model | Celica | Crown |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1799 cc | 1837 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 80 HP |
| Torque | 177 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 61 L |
