2000 Toyota Celica vs. 1966 Volvo 144
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Volvo 144. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Volvo 144 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Volvo 144 (124 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Volvo 144 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 320 kg more than 1966 Volvo 144.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Volvo 144. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 455 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Volvo 144. (167 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Volvo 144.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Toyota Celica | 1966 Volvo 144 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Celica | 144 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 124 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 622 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2620 mm |
