2000 Toyota Celica vs. 1968 Triumph 2.5
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2.5 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (150 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2.5 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 477 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2.5.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Triumph 2.5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 400 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2.5. (222 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2.5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Toyota Celica | 1968 Triumph 2.5 | |
| Make | Toyota | Triumph |
| Model | Celica | 2.5 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 622 Nm | 222 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1133 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 64 L |
