2000 Toyota Celica vs. 1975 Datsun 260Z
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Datsun 260Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Datsun 260Z (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Datsun 260Z should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 410 kg more than 1975 Datsun 260Z.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Datsun 260Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 409 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Datsun 260Z. (213 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Datsun 260Z. 1975 Datsun 260Z has automatic transmission and 2000 Toyota Celica has manual transmission. 2000 Toyota Celica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1975 Datsun 260Z will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Toyota Celica | 1975 Datsun 260Z | |
| Make | Toyota | Datsun |
| Model | Celica | 260Z |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 622 Nm | 213 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2581 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 60 L |
