2000 Toyota Celica vs. 1978 Zastava 750

To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Celica (190 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 750. (30 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 903 kg more than 1978 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (177 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 750. (51 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 750.

Compare all specifications: