2000 Toyota Celica vs. 2009 Audi A6
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A6 (178 HP) has 104 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Toyota Celica | 2009 Audi A6 | |
Make | Toyota | Audi |
Model | Celica | A6 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 178 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4934 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1519 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2833 mm |