2000 Toyota Celica vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (83 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 505 kg more than 2009 Volkswagen Polo.

Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 500 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volkswagen Polo. (122 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volkswagen Polo.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Toyota Celica 2009 Volkswagen Polo
Make Toyota Volkswagen
Model Celica Polo
Year Released 2000 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 1390 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 74 HP 83 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 622 Nm 122 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 10.5:1
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1610 kg 1105 kg
Vehicle Length 4450 mm 3920 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1280 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2470 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 87 L 45 L