2000 Toyota Celica vs. 2009 Volvo XC90

To start off, 2009 Volvo XC90 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo XC90 (232 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo XC90. (236 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo XC90. 2009 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 2000 Toyota Celica has manual transmission. 2000 Toyota Celica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Toyota Celica 2009 Volvo XC90
Make Toyota Volvo
Model Celica XC90
Year Released 2000 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 3192 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 74 HP 232 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 622 Nm 236 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 9.0:1
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 7 seats
Vehicle Length 4450 mm 4810 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1280 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 87 L 70 L