2000 Toyota Celica vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Celica (189 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Celica. (180 Nm @ 6800 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Toyota Celica | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Toyota | Ford |
| Model | Celica | E-350 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 57 L |
