2000 Toyota Celica vs. 2010 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 163 kg more than 2010 Ford Ranger.

Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 413 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Ranger.

Compare all specifications: