2000 Toyota Celica vs. 2011 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2011 Holden Colorado is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Celica (189 HP) has 66 more horse power than 2011 Holden Colorado. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Colorado.
Because 2011 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Celica. (180 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Toyota Celica | 2011 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Toyota | Holden |
| Model | Celica | Colorado |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
