2000 Toyota Crown vs. 2011 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1452 kg more than 2000 Toyota Crown.
Because 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Toyota Crown. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2000 Toyota Crown has manual transmission. 2000 Toyota Crown will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Toyota Crown | 2011 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Toyota | Land Rover |
| Model | Crown | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 510 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 2672 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4973 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2035 mm |
