2000 Toyota Crown vs. 2013 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2013 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1494 kg more than 2000 Toyota Crown.
Because 2013 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Toyota Crown. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Toyota Sequoia has automatic transmission and 2000 Toyota Crown has manual transmission. 2000 Toyota Crown will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Sequoia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Toyota Crown | 2013 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Toyota | Toyota |
Model | Crown | Sequoia |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 376 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 2714 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2030 mm |