2000 Toyota Hi-Ace vs. 1978 Audi Fox
To start off, 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Audi Fox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Audi Fox would be higher. At 2,444 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace weights approximately 803 kg more than 1978 Audi Fox.
Because 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi Fox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace | 1978 Audi Fox | |
| Make | Toyota | Audi |
| Model | Hi-Ace | Fox |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2444 cc | 1272 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 912 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1380 mm |
