2000 Toyota Land Cruiser vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 2,982 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser (161 HP) has 82 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Because 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Micra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser (343 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Toyota Land Cruiser | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Toyota | Nissan |
Model | Land Cruiser | Micra |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2982 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 343 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2449 mm |