2000 Toyota Opa vs. 2010 Citroen C1
To start off, 2010 Citroen C1 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Opa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Opa would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Opa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Opa (150 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Opa should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C1 weights approximately 202 kg more than 2000 Toyota Opa.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Opa (200 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 Toyota Opa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Toyota Opa | 2010 Citroen C1 | |
Make | Toyota | Citroen |
Model | Opa | C1 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 23.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1472 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 35 L |