2000 Toyota Picnic vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Picnic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Picnic would be higher. At 1,988 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Picnic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Picnic. (127 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Picnic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Picnic (181 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Picnic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Toyota Picnic | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Toyota | Holden |
Model | Picnic | Cruze |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 181 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2685 mm |