2000 Toyota Tundra vs. 2013 Bentley Continental
To start off, 2013 Bentley Continental is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 5,998 cc, 2013 Bentley Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Bentley Continental (616 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 429 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Tundra. (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Bentley Continental should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Tundra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Bentley Continental weights approximately 630 kg more than 2000 Toyota Tundra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Bentley Continental (800 Nm @ 5600 RPM) has 502 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Tundra. (298 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Bentley Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Toyota Tundra | 2013 Bentley Continental | |
Make | Toyota | Bentley |
Model | Tundra | Continental |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3400 cc | 5998 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 616 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 800 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 2350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4804 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2227 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2746 mm |