2000 Toyota Tundra vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (268 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Tundra. (242 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Tundra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 420 kg more than 2013 Cadillac ATS.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Tundra (426 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac ATS. (353 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2000 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac ATS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Toyota Tundra | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
| Make | Toyota | Cadillac |
| Model | Tundra | ATS |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4663 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 268 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 426 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 86 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4643 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1805 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1421 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2775 mm |
